Nadya Suleman- the worst mother in history!

When I was watching Nancy Grace on the Dr. Phil I was surprised to find that I was actually agreeing with her…AT FIRST.

“What kind of irresponsible person does something like this” — Check“Having ivf with 6 kids at home- ridiculous” — Check

“We need to go after the Dr, but we also need to support this mother and family” — Ch….. Wait a minute, WTF? You lost me there Nancy. I thought you might have grown a brain, but I was wrong. You are as big a moron as always.(Quotes paraphrased)

I agree the Dr does bear some responsibility, but the buck stops with NADYA SULEMAN. She specifically went to this DR because he bends the rules. She went in “for one more baby” (WHEN THERE ARE ALREADY 6 in a home with NO INCOME), and was implanted with 6. How could this happen? I’ll tell you how:

The Dr/clinic told Nadya they would no longer store the embryos. (It cost money to store them, and Nadya’s well had run dry. No money = no storage)Nadya had the option to say “No Doctor….. I cannot afford to take the risks of having 6 more babies, let’s just do one.”
Did she do that? HELL NO. She knew she could not afford to continue storing them, and she also knew she could not afford further IFV when she wanted more babies.

So what to do….. What to do….. THE SELFISH SOW CHOSE TO HAVE ALL 6 IMPLANTED. With no job, in an overcrowded home, this sociopath made her decision. Hell no, she would not reduce the number of babies, she wanted them all! That’s why she had them all implanted.

DUH!

Was she worried about how she would pay for everything? Hell No. Because from DAY ONE she has been counting on THE PUBLIC to support her and her brood via donation. She was counting on the interviews, the book, the TV show. And they are all doing EXACTLY what she wants. She wants a TV show so she can give parenting tips…. Well Excuse the F out of me, but I would rather get parenting tips from Ted Bundy (also a sociopath). At least he was intelligent. Hell, I would listen to JOAN CRAWFORD (Mommy Dearest) give parenting advice before I would listen to Nadya. I’ll go you one better, I would listen to Dave Pelzer’s mom (If you don’t know who she is, look up A Child Called It. She tormented her son for years. The atrocious abuse she inflicted upon her son made me literally nauseous) before I would even think about tuning into Nadya advice hour.

“I love all my babies” she moans on screen, “I am a good mom”

A good mom does not spend a large sum on plastic surgery. She spends it on the kiddos.

A good mom does not go out and buy a $20.00 lip-gloss. She opts, instead, to spend the money on diapers.

A good mom does not have 6 children living in a 2 bedroom house, a house that contains 3 adults as well.

A good mom WORKS HER ASS OFF to provide for her children. She does not rely on the government or on “donations”

A good mom RAISES HER OWN CHILDREN and does not expect HER MOTHER TO DO IT.

A good mom would have STOPPED AT 6.

A good mom loves her CHILDREN more than she LOVES HERSELF. Nadya does not.

Nadya is NOT a good mom. She is not even a good person.

Select few people in history have names that are cringe worthy. Names that solicit feelings of instant anger/hatred when mentioned.

The short list:
Nadya Suleman
Adolf Hitler
Charles Manson
Ayatollah Khomeini
Judas
Benito Mussolini
Saddam Hussein
Satan
The KKK (ok a group, but still cringe worthy)

Am I pushing the pen by comparing this woman to these horrible people? Nope. Nadya Suleman will go down as the worst, most hated mother in history. And she damn well deserves it.

SPAY Nadya

Alan posted this link on www.nadyasuleman.com and it is worth repeating/sharing:

For those interested, you can get “Spay Nadya” t-shirts. Not sure about the quality of the shirts, though. http://www.cafepress.com/spay_nadya

NADYA SULEMAN - POSSIBLE SOCIOPATH?

Scary but true- Nadya Suleman fits most of the warning signs of a sociopath.

Candee posted this on the webpage located at www.nadyasuleman.com

Here is a list of the traits of a sociopath. You don’t have to have all of them to be a sociopath, either. But Nadya has enough.

1. GLIB and SUPERFICIAL CHARM — the tendency to be smooth, engaging, charming, slick, and verbally facile. Sociopathic charm is not in the least shy, self-conscious, or afraid to say anything. A sociopath never gets tongue-tied. They have freed themselves from the social conventions about taking turns in talking, for example.
2. GRANDIOSE SELF-WORTH — a grossly inflated view of one’s abilities and self-worth, self-assured, opinionated, cocky, a braggart. Sociopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior human beings.
3. NEED FOR STIMULATION or PRONENESS TO BOREDOM — an excessive need for novel, thrilling, and exciting stimulation; taking chances and doing things that are risky. Sociopaths often have low self-discipline in carrying tasks through to completion because they get bored easily. They fail to work at the same job for any length of time, for example, or to finish tasks that they consider dull or routine.
4. PATHOLOGICAL LYING — can be moderate or high; in moderate form, they will be shrewd, crafty, cunning, sly, and clever; in extreme form, they will be deceptive, deceitful, underhanded, unscrupulous, manipulative, and dishonest.
5. CONNING AND MANIPULATIVENESS- the use of deceit and deception to cheat, con, or defraud others for personal gain; distinguished from Item #4 in the degree to which exploitation and callous ruthlessness is present, as reflected in a lack of concern for the feelings and suffering of one’s victims.
6. LACK OF REMORSE OR GUILT — a lack of feelings or concern for the losses, pain, and suffering of victims; a tendency to be unconcerned, dispassionate, coldhearted, and un empathic. This item is usually demonstrated by a disdain for one’s victims.
7. SHALLOW AFFECT — emotional poverty or a limited range or depth of feelings; interpersonal coldness in spite of signs of open gregariousness.
8. CALLOUSNESS and LACK OF EMPATHY — a lack of feelings toward people in general; cold, contemptuous, inconsiderate, and tactless.
9. PARASITIC LIFESTYLE — an intentional, manipulative, selfish, and exploitative financial dependence on others as reflected in a lack of motivation, low self-discipline, and inability to begin or complete responsibilities.
10. POOR BEHAVIORAL CONTROLS — expressions of irritability, annoyance, impatience, threats, aggression, and verbal abuse; inadequate control of anger and temper; acting hastily.
11. PROMISCUOUS SEXUAL BEHAVIOR — a variety of brief, superficial relations, numerous affairs, and an indiscriminate selection of sexual partners; the maintenance of several relationships at the same time; a history of attempts to sexually coerce others into sexual activity or taking great pride at discussing sexual exploits or conquests.
12. EARLY BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS — a variety of behaviors prior to age 13, including lying, theft, cheating, vandalism, bullying, sexual activity, fire-setting, glue-sniffing, alcohol use, and running away from home.
13. LACK OF REALISTIC, LONG-TERM GOALS — an inability or persistent failure to develop and execute long-term plans and goals; a nomadic existence, aimless, lacking direction in life.
14. IMPULSIVITY — the occurrence of behaviors that are unpremeditated and lack reflection or planning; inability to resist temptation, frustrations, and urges; a lack of deliberation without considering the consequences; foolhardy, rash, unpredictable, erratic, and reckless.
15. IRRESPONSIBILITY — repeated failure to fulfill or honor obligations and commitments; such as not paying bills, defaulting on loans, performing sloppy work, being absent or late to work, failing to honor contractual agreements.
16. FAILURE TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR OWN ACTIONS — a failure to accept responsibility for one’s actions reflected in low conscientiousness, an absence of dutifulness, antagonistic manipulation, denial of responsibility, and an effort to manipulate others through this denial.
17. MANY SHORT-TERM MARITAL RELATIONSHIPS — a lack of commitment to a long-term relationship reflected in inconsistent, undependable, and unreliable commitments in life, including marital.
18. JUVENILE DELINQUENCY — behavior problems between the ages of 13-18; mostly behaviors that are crimes or clearly involve aspects of antagonism, exploitation, aggression, manipulation, or a callous, ruthless tough-mindedness.
19. REVOCATION OF CONDITION RELEASE — a revocation of probation or other conditional release due to technical violations, such as carelessness, low deliberation, or failing to appear.
20. CRIMINAL VERSATILITY — a diversity of types of criminal offenses, regardless if the person has been arrested or convicted for them; taking great pride at getting away with crimes.


Sound like anyone that has been in the public eye recently? HMMMMMMMM.............

Today while bottle feeding an abandoned kitten, I was thinking about the poor kids involved in this fiasco. Has Ms. Nadya "I can do what I want" Suleman even considered the babies development, let alone that of her prior 6?

Dr. Bruce Perry, PHD wrote an excellent book entitled The Boy Who Was Raised As A Dog, And Other Stories From A Child Psychiatrist’s Notebook. Several of the cases he covered come to mind when viewing the train wreck which is Nadya Suleman. The following is a brief description of what can be expected from infants raised without enough individual attention from a single primary caregiver.

Firstly, one must understand that the brain is an historical organ. It stores our personal narrative. Life experiences shape who we become by creating the brains template of memories which guide behavior. Sometimes this happens in ways we are conscious of, but most often this occurs in a process beyond our awareness.

Since the brain develops in early life, the way we are parented has a dramatic influence on brain development. Since we tend to care for our children in the same manner we were cared for ourselves at children, we greatly influence future generations.

More than any other species, our young are born vulnerable and dependent. Pregnancy and early childhood are tremendous energy drains on the mother and also on the larger family group. Due to the loud, constant demands of a newborn, human mothers instinctively tend to devote themselves to comforting, feeding and protecting their young.

In turn, during infant development, in ordinary circumstances, infants receive attentive, attuned and loving care. When cold, hungry thirsty, frightened or distressed in any way, the cries of the infant will bring the comforting mother who will meet the needs and dissolve the infant’s distress with loving attention. With this loving care 2 major neural networks will be stimulated simultaneously in the infants developing brain. The first is the complex set of sensory perceptions associated with human relational inter-actions: the mothers face, smile, touch, voice and scent. The second is stimulation of the neural networks mediating “pleasure”. This “reward system” can be activated by the relief of distress, quenching thirst, satisfying hunger, calming anxiety…All result in a sense of pleasure and comfort. When these 2 patterns of neural activity occur simultaneously, and with repetition, an association is made between them in the developing brain. Pleasure and human interaction become inextricably woven together, and is the important neurobiological “glue” that bonds and creates human relationships. Because of this, the most powerful reward for a child is the attention, approval and affection of a loved one. Consequently, the most powerful pain a child can experience is loss of attention, and loss of affection.

For the majority of infants, your mother or father will be present repeatedly to meet your needs. Time and time again that parent will come when you cry, and soothe you, when you are hungry they will feed you, when you are cold or scared they will comfort you. As the brain develops, the template is formed for future relationships. Attachment is the template for human – to – human bonds. IT IS PROFOUNDLY INFLUENCED WHEN YOU RECEIVE INCONSISTENT, DISRUPTED or NEGLETFUL CARE.

As the child’s brain grows, it grows in a use-dependent manner. Meaning that neural systems used become more dominant, and those not used grow less so. As the child grows, many systems of the brain require stimulation if they are to develop. Furthermore, this use-dependent development MUST occur at certain times, or the systems WILL NOT FUNCTION at their best. If this “sensitive period” is missed, some systems may never reach their full potential, and the deficit may be permanent. For example, if one kitten’s eye is kept closed during the first few weeks of life, then the kitten will be blind in that eye, even though the eye is completely normal. The visual circuitry of the brain requires normal experience of sight in order to wire itself. Lacking visual stimuli, the neurons in the closed eye fail to make the needed connections, so the opportunity for sight and depth perception is lost. Similarly if a child is not exposed to language during early life, they may never speak of understand speech normally.

Children who do not get constant physical affection and the chance to build loving bonds will not receive the patterned stimulation needed to form proper human to human interactions.
If just the basic needs are fulfilled, feeding, bathing, dressing, the consequences can be devastating. Babies need the individual attention to develop emotionally. A parent who does not hold the baby, or who feeds the little one propped up with a bottle as opposed to cuddled close to the bosom, one who does not spend significant time rocking baby, cooing and staring into its eyes, and playing with baby (silly but hugely important things) is depriving their baby the physical and emotional signals all mammals need to stimulate growth. Without these things, the child cannot grow. The child will stop gaining weight.

The term used to describe babies who fail to grow, lose weight due to emotional neglect is “Failure to Thrive”. This is a syndrome associated with infants and children raised without enough INDIVIDUALIZED attention and nurturing. This has been documented for centuries, most notably in orphanages or institutions where there is NOT ENOUGH ATTENTION TO GO AROUND. If not addressed early, IT CAN BE DEADLY. One study found that children raised without receiving enough individual attention have and extraordinarily high death rate and often develop a condition known as infant anorexia, due to failure to eat/keep down food. Children who do survive such emotional deprivation often have severe behavior problems, hoard food, are overly affectionate with strangers while having difficulty maintaining relationships with family, bizarre and horrible violent outbursts in which they completely lose control and last for hours, not to mention other serious social and academic problems.

Babies are born with core elements of the stress response already intact and centered in the lower, most primitive parts of their developing brains. When the infant gets signals from inside it body - or from external senses -that something is not right, these register as “distress”. This “distress” can be hunger, if calories are needed, thirst, if it is dehydrated, or anxiety, if it perceives an external threat. When the distress is relieved, the infant feels pleasure. Babies instinctively find being held, touched, rocked and soothed by the one that smells like “mother” pleasurable. Therefore an interaction with the mother, developed over the thousands of times she must pick up baby when it cries/needs attention, becomes the stress-modulator for baby. The baby must rely on mother not only ease hunger, but to soothe the ongoing anxiety that comes to baby due to not being able to care for itself. If the parent gives the needed individual attention, then baby will eventually learn to soothe and comfort itself, a skill needed later in life when facing ups and downs.

If a baby’s smiles are not responded to by “mommy” (the primary care-giver) if she is repeatedly left to cry, or if she is fed without tenderness, if she is not held enough, the baby experiences the agony of loss of security. The loss of stimulation will be devastating. The infant’s body will respond with a hormonal dysregulation that impedes normal growth, despite receiving more than adequate nutrition. The problem is similar to what is called “runt syndrome”. In litters of mice, rats, even puppies and kittens, the smallest, weakest animal often dies within a few weeks following birth. The mother does not pay the necessary individual attention to the smallest one, which limits its growth.

Infants found with failure to thrive syndrome have reduced levels of growth hormone, often due to neglect during a needed time of stimulation. Such children, like the scrawny runt in a litter of puppies, do not receive the physical nurturing their body needs to know that they are “wanted” and that it is safe to flourish and grow. For children who do not have failure to thrive, but are brought up in the same environment, the results can be equally as disturbing, They may experience the same severe behavior problems, hoard food, are overly affectionate with strangers while having difficulty maintaining relationships with family, bizarre and horrible violent outbursts in which they completely lose control and last for hours, not to mention other serious social and academic problems. Physical results can include brain regions being that are seriously deprived or having nor received enough stimulation to make up for emotional neglect, and fractured neurodevelopment. There may be cortical atrophy, large ventricles (which means that spinal fluid takes up space that is normally occupied by brain tissue), and lower brain structures that are massively under-developed.

Looks like Nadya’s kids have a whole lot to look forward to. Kind of hard for a primary caregiver to give the individualized attention needed to one baby when there are 13 other kids that need the same tlc.

Not to mention that Nadya’s irresponsible paranting has already left an IMPRINT/TEMPLATE on the 6 existing kids. So we can look forward to another generation of Sulemans/Solomons that think they are entitled to use welfare/us citizens as their personal wallets, because they are

“special”.

The only way these kids are going to stand a chance is to give the 8 to families that can parent them properly.

Naya Suleman- A biblical lesson she needs to learn-

I tried to post this on a message board earlier, but for whatever reason, it did not post. So I will repeat it here.

If Nadya really cared about ANY of the 14 kids, she would put the 8 up for adoption. With OPEN adoption, she and her other 6 kids could still be a part of their life. She could concentrate on the 6 she has semi-raised, get a job and become a productive member of society. That way all 14 would get the love, attention and care they need. The book of 1 Kings says it best:

1 Kings 3:16-27

16 Now two prostitutes came to the king and stood before him.

17 One of them said, “My lord, this woman and I live in the same house. I had a baby while she was there with me.

18 The third day after my child was born, this woman also had a baby. We were alone; there was no one in the house but the two of us.

19 “During the night this woman’s son died because she lay on him.

20 So she got up in the middle of the night and took my son from my side while I your servant was asleep. She put him by her breast and put her dead son by my breast.

21 The next morning, I got up to nurse my son—and he was dead! But when I looked at him closely in the morning light, I saw that it wasn’t the son I had borne.”

22 The other woman said, “No! The living one is my son; the dead one is yours.” But the first one insisted, “No! The dead one is yours; the living one is mine.” And so they argued before the king.

23 The king said, “This one says, ‘My son is alive and your son is dead,’ while that one says, ‘No! Your son is dead and mine is alive.’ ”

24 Then the king said, “Bring me a sword.” So they brought a sword for the king.

25 He then gave an order: “Cut the living child in two and give half to one and half to the other.”

26 The woman whose son was alive was filled with compassion for her son and said to the king, “Please, my lord, give her the living baby! Don’t kill him!” But the other said, “Neither I nor you shall have him. Cut him in two!”

27 Then the king gave his ruling: “Give the living baby to the first woman. Do not kill him; she is his mother.”

The point?

A good mother would rather her child be alive and living elsewhere with another mother than dead in her arms.

Nadya needs to give these children a chance at a good life, a chance to flourish and thrive. She can do this for the good of ALL. All 14 kids, her parents, and even for

HER OWN GOOD.

Blessings and Good Night~

Suleman the SOW discussing who should play her in a movie about her life

http://x17online.com/celebrities/octomom/octomom_i_need_a_new_home-02192009.php

Impending homelessness doesn't seem to be weighing her down too much. Check out the video below to see how she spent the day with a couple of her older children, and listen to what she has to say about who should play her in a movie of her life!!! (Gag me with a spoon)

God forbid she put any thought into names.....

TMZ has tracked down the birth certificates of Nadya Suleman's octuplets. The records show all eight children have the same middle name.
The certificates, released by the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, show Suleman chose the middle name "Angel" for her newborns.
A report from TMZ notes that no father is listed on the birth certificates, all of which were signed by the mother.

As for the other six of Suleman's previous kids, four of the documents have "David Solomon" listed as the dad. The other two have no father listed, but all six kids have Solomon's last name. Despite the same name, the father reported four different dates of birth on the certificates.

- Download the certificates from TMZ.com (PDF):
http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/assets/pdf/0219_octomom_all_wm02.pdf
- Read more at TMZ.com: http://www.tmz.com/2009/02/19/octuplets-octomom-birth-certificates/

Guess she can't be bothered to try and come up with/memorize individual middle names for the 8- She is too busy trying to keep her lies straight, not to mention too busy buying $20.00 lip-gloss for her trout pout.

Meanwhile, her father told Oprah Winfrey his daughter is "absolutely irresponsible." In an interview taped Thursday, Ed Doud said he questions the "mental situation" of his daughter, Nadya Suleman. The interview is set to air Feb. 24 on 'The Oprah Winfrey Show.'
Doud said he hopes Suleman will finish her education and start working so she can help support the family. Obviously daddy Doud is just as delusional as his offspring (aka THE HELLSPAWN.)


More before and after pictures posted by STAR:

School friends of Octo-Mom Nadya Suleman say that she was always a little different — and she looked quite different as well. In the March 2 issue of Star — on sale today — we have exclusive photos of the mother of 14 before she morphed into an Angelia Jolie wannabe, as well as the scoop on her from a former classmate.



Photo credit: STAR MAGAZINE

Here's a sneak peek at one of the photos of Nadya. This one was taken in 1988 — when she was a seventh grader at Alvarado Middle School in Rowland Heights, Calif. Interestingly, she went by the name Natalie Doud (her mom's maiden name) in her early school years.
See our exclusive photo spread of Nadya from her school days — and read what her classmate has to say about her — in Star today!

AMAZING-- The story gets better and better....

Photo credit: Perez (http://perezhilton.com/2009-02-19-wtf-octo-moms-looking-to-buy-124-million-home#respond)

From TMZ-- UPDATE: 4:54 ET PM. We just called back our contact at Century 21, the agency that has listed the house. They claim Nadya is indeed an interested buyer. But here’s the rub. We’re told a big TV show has the house for the day and is there doing a sit-down interview with Nadya…. UNBELIEVABLE!!! We’ve confirmed OctoMom Nadya Suleman is looking to buy a home listed for $1.24 MILLION! On the taxpayer’s $$$. Octo is there right now … the house is in Whittier, California. It has 4 bedrooms, 2 1/2 bathrooms and a pool with no safety gates. Perfect for 14 kids. A real estate source tells TMZ the owner canceled showings today specifically because Octo wanted to see it. She needs it because the house she’s living in now may be on its way to the auction block — as in foreclosure. How is she getting the money? Put it this way — this chick works the media better than Obama. PHOTOS AT TMZ Please note, in most places the deed restrictions require no more than 2 people PER ROOM. This house is still not meeting minimum CPS guidelines. While it does not have enough bedrooms, it does have one thing Nadya cannot live without- a pool for her to sun herself by.... Celebrity style. (BARF)

More pics at http://photos.tmz.com/galleries/octomoms_new_home#36800

The Brood Mare otherwise known as Nadya Suleman... looking at million dollar homes

Check out TMZ.... Miss Nadya "I have no job and live on disability" Suleman was out looking at houses priced around 1.2 Million dollars.

No job = Million Dollar home....


Where the hell do I sign up for that program?????

I am going to go vomit now. Can someone please clue Obama in on this misuse of US Tax dollars???

Still think we need to send her money Dr. Phil?

Dr. Phil revisits the Nadya Suleman story (yawn)

Today Dr. Phil revisited the Nadya Suleman story he aired last week. Today he included updates, on air play of "threatning voicemails" (most of which were not threats at all) Talked to Nancy Grace (yawn- she suggest going after the Dr.) and talked to a former high school pal of Nadyas. Now this former high school friend.... Gee- seems Nadya's "high school friend" is as big a liar as she is. There are tons of before and after pics on the internet. Before, she had a thinner upper lip and smaller lips in general. Now, every part of her mouth (top, sides, and bottom) is so inflated, she looks like a cross between Lisa Rinni and a Bratz doll. The friend gave the example “When I was pregnant, my nose was very swollen".
That excuse DOES NOT WASH, sister! Nadya's nose has gotten MUCH SMALLER and THINNER, so how does that compare to pregnant bloating???? NOSE = SMALLER, NOT BIGGER.

How are we expected to believe one word this so called friend uttered, whey she blatantly lied about the plastic surgery? The answer... WE CANNOT BELIEVE HER.

Interesting information that someone posted on another board, in response to a picture of Nadya withdrawing cash from the bank with a huge smile on her face:

Want to get more infuriated? She’ll be making MORE deposits after the preemies come home
AUTOMATICALLY. Before anyone considers helping Nadya further, they need to know that all eight babies, from the day they were born, qualified for SSI payments for a minimum of 12 months, because each weighed less that 1200 grams when born. Together with the other three for a total of 11 at approx. $700 each per month, the total Nadya receives per month is approx. $7,700.00 for her children.” Wanting so very MUCH not to see her going to the bank to make withdrawals for nails, MAC lip-gloss, video games etc., I thought, OH NO, this surely cannot be true! Alas, I think my “hope account” (which never had any deposits to begin with!) on this circus has exhausted itself. Here you go for proof:
A friend’s daughter receives SSI benefits for being born premature. She weighed 1 pd 14 oz & was 3 1/2 months early. They filed for SSI benefits in either late May or early June, not really sure. They qualified & she receives $30 a month while she is still in the NICU but will receive $630 when she is home.

So want to place a wager Nadya knew this BEFORE she decided so mercifully not to selectively reduce? Don’t EVEN try telling me she didn’t with three of her kids on SSI already

Now, supposedly, Oprah is paying Ed Suleman for an interview. ENOUGH. It is time for America to JOIN TOGETHER AND BOYCOTT.

BOYCOTT OPRAH and ALL HER SPONSORS.

BOYCOTT EXTRA and ALL SPONSORS.

BOYCOTT DR PHIL and ALL SPONSORS.

BOYCOTT TLC IF THEY GIVE HER A SHOW.

BOYCOTT PUBLISHER IF SHE GETS A BOOK DEAL.

BOYCOTT ANY PROGRAM featuring this woman and/or parents.
BOYCOTT any CHANNEL that airs a program featuring them.
BOYCOTT any MAGAZINE featuring them.
BOYCOTT any PRODUCT/SPONSOR that advertizes for these programs/magazines.

Stand up and let your voice be heard.

Let these entities know WE WILL NOT SUPPORT THIS WOMAN or anyone who endorses her. Let them know we are TIRED of people ABUSING THE SYSTEM.

Did America sit back an let Britan unjustly raise the taxes on tea? Hell no, we revolted. So let's not sit on our asses while this parasitic leech of a woman milks the system of millions that should go to people who actually work and pay into the system.

Otherwise the next woman will have 15 kids, then 16, and so on and so on. Because they will know they can do it, get away with the scam, and make a profit.

Right now elderly people who have WORKED all their lives and paid IN to Social Security cannot afford the medicines that are necessary for them, because their SS checks are a pittance. And this woman, this drain on society receives SSI for children that she DOES NOT WORK TO SUPPORT.

The authorities won’t do anything (including investigate) without a report. Maybe we should all be making use of these contact numbers:

WELFARE FRAUD PREVENTION & INVESTIGATIONS
(800) 349-9970
12000 Hawthorne Blvd.
Hawthorne, CA. 90250

Investigates allegations of potential welfare fraud in the following
programs: CalWORKs (formerly known as AFDC), Food Stamps,
General Relief, In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS), and the
GAIN program.

Workers’ Compensation Fraud Division - Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office
201 N. Figueroa St., Suite 1500
Los Angeles, CA. 90012
Phone: (213) 580-3200

Investigates Workers’ Compensation fraud.

I notice the Dr. Phil's updated news story does not mention that this is the 3rd home the Sulemans have let get foreclosed on. These people are scam artists, grifters, and leeches on the system. Why should we feel sorry for them? HELLO— THIRD TIME THEY HAVE DONE THIS!!! How do they keep getting loans??? Most people with a so-so credit rating cannot get a home, but this lot got a THIRD loan, after having two prior foreclosures??? After the first foreclosure, shouldn’t the new loan officer have said… “Hmmm they might be a credit risk”? Or even after the SECOND foreclosure??????

Instead of running around spending our tax dollars and/or donations made to the babies on getting her nails done (NOT a necessity), buying video games (NOT a necessity... wish my kids had expensive video games, but I can't afford it, and no one sends me money!) and having huge shopping sprees at Target (Guess the babies had to have the $300.00 carpet cleaner, the $100.00 was not good enough!) and buying expensive MAC cosmetics, why doesn’t Nadya (aka the breeder) use some of the $100,000.00 (that NBC paid her for interview) or some of the $200,000.00 (that the British Sun newspaper paid her for interview and pics) or the $100,000.00 (that IDIOTIC MORONS have donated to her website) to catch up the back payments on the house? I mean $23,000.00 out of $400,000.00 would still leave her with $387,000.00 to blow on bad cosmetic surgery and shopping sprees. We all know that none of the money is going towards the kids.

Hopefully Angela Suleman will show some responsibility and use the $40,000.00 that RADAR paid her for her interview to catch up on all those missed house payments. It is obvious that Nadya and co is hoping Extreme Home Makeover will swoop in and give them a "Mini Mansion". (If EHM does this, we will add them to the boycott list!)

Also- am I the only one who thought that 98% of the messages they played/read were NOT in fact, death threats? If someone says “I hope you burn in hell,” THAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A DEATH THREAT, unless, perhaps, if the person leaving the message is Lucifer Morningstar, aka Satan. There is a HUGE difference in saying something like (for example… and again, these are examples Dr. Phil and Nancy Grace, I am not making threats –eyes rolling--) “I hope they rip your uterus out” (NOT A THREAT) as opposed to “I am on my way over to (insert whatever the address is) to rip your uterus out” (2nd version is a threat, and again, not what the person actually said!) or how about another “You deserve to be thrown in a wood chipper” (NOT A THREAT) as opposed to “I am on my way to (whatever location is) to put you in the wood chipper” (again, 2nd version would be a threat, but was not what the caller said. And it is not a threat against someone’s life to say “I am going to say your company on my radio show and boycott your clients”. That person had EVERY RIGHT to say that… Their radio show, they can boycott if they want, weather the company approves or not.

I am so disappointed in you, Dr. Phil. You have gone, in my book and many others, from HERO to ZERO.

Foster care is not a horrible thing. Look at wonderful foster parents like Kathy Harrison (Author of One Small Boat and Another Place at the Table).

SO you don’t want the kiddies to go into foster care. Fine. Let Nadya keep the 6 children she has “bonded” with (and I use that term VERY LOOSELY). She should have to give the 8 babies up for adoption. There are massive waiting lists for babies, so they would be swooped up immediately. Do open adoptions, so they can grow up visiting their siblings. That way, all 14 children would have a chance at a happy, healthy, productive life. OR, remove Nadya from the equation. Give custody of all 14 to the grandparents, and relinquish Nadya’s access to the funds. Then maybe people would be more willing to accept the welfare issue.

As it stands, if ANYONE gives Nadya access to donations/food stamps/disability then you are just as guilty as she is, because you now know the money is not being spent in the best interest of the children.

If you want to help, Dr. Phil, Oprah, Nancy, whoever, instead of giving this woman more infamy and airtime, give things the babies need. Diapers, formula, whatever. But NOT MONEY, because that is going to Nadya for surgery, nails, expensive lip gloss, etc.

Come on Governor Arnold…. Let’s see some preemptive action taken, and send CPS to take possession of ALL the children ASAP. If you do not, or CPS does not investigate based on all the letters and calls they are receiving, then the federal government needs to intercede and do what is best for these children. As a taxed CA resident who is currently working in another state on a temporary basis, I am seriously considering a move for my family, just so I don’t have to pay for this woman’s idiocy for the next 18 years.

Any likeminded people, who are tired of Nadya begging for money while at the same time taking it out of the system, check out http://www.nadyasuleman.com/. It is a blog and message forum set up for frustrated taxpayers to vent. No threats, just facts.

As Candee posted a few minutes ago “I hope Nadya had a nice time shopping at NORDSTROM today! How is it that she has money to spend on her nails and her lips, but she doesn’t have money to provide for her children? She is on her website begging the public for donations for them - she has a tin cup in one hand and a credit card in the other. I’m sick of seeing her on TV grabbing her children’s faces with her nicely-manicured fingernails and smacking kisses on them with her ugly fish lips, as if that’s what being a good mother is all about. God help those poor children.”

How many parent out there would be happy to have enough money to shop at Wal-Mart, let alone Target. NORDSTROM? Are you KIDDING ME? SHE IS SHOPPING AT NORDSTROM PEOPLE!!! For lip-gloss that is almost $20.00 a tube! And you want us to send her more money Dr. Phil?? How many parents have to shop at thrift stores and the Salvation Army? Certainly not Nadya Suleman! Only the best for her, because she is a celebrity! (BARF... GAG)

If you are tired of Nadya milking the system, tired of Nadya getting publicity, money, etc, then copy this post, and email it to your friends, post it on blogs. Lets spread the word about the amount she is receiving from SSI. Lets get the boycott going. Think about it in these terms: For the tax dollars she spent on lip-gloss, a child could have had shoes. For the amount she spent on her nails, a child could have had a meal. That’s not even getting into the plastic surgery and shopping sprees. What could a truly needy family do with the $7,000.00 a month Nadya is receiving for sitting at home on her rear? What could YOU give to a needy family in your neighborhood, church or school for $7,000.00 a month? What could a disabled/elderly/mom working 2 jobs do with that money? Answer- they would use it to feed and clothe their children, pay for medicine, WORTHWHILE things. NECESSARY THINGS. NOT for needless high end lip-gloss, French manicured acrylic nails and overpriced video games.

NO MORE NADYA. HER 15 MINUTES OF FAME END NOW. Let the only thing her scheming idiocy and infamy reward her with be the loss of her 14 children to GOOD, CARING, NURTURING homes.